Good lord so much misinformation and crap so lets debunk this nonsense before someone takes it serious.
Except there are literally 4 wifi antennas in the Rog3 for instance while consumer phones have half of it. Not only that but you can use dual band to connect to 2 wifi spots at the same time using them both simultaneously and to boot you get ASUS's hyperfusion technology, to quote gsmarena:
The ROG Phone 4 has a total of four Wi-Fi antennas and a system called HyperFusion, which allows the software to switch between these automatically, as well as a cellular data connection, for the lowest possible latency and best speed.
Wifi capabilities are measurably better on gaming phones that focus on wifi such as the Rog3. Wifi is much more stable than your typical consumer phones. Your claim about average wifi coverage is baseless and is something you can throw out the window. When doing a speedtest my Rog3 consistently outperformed a S20 ultra, Iphone 12, razer phone 1, and a motorolla one zoom, which the zoom hilariously enough came in 2nd, the worst of them all was the S20 ultra, this is based on 15 speedtests on all phones.
Gaming phones ranks higher in synthetic benchmark but that does not mean that real life experience is any different from any other devices having the same hardware and thermal throttling depends from device to device.
Another clueless claim that needs debunking this instant. Gaming phones do infact NOT score higher in synthethic benchmarks, it's exacly the opposite. Gaming Phones score the same as consumer grade phones as synthethic benchmarks are quite short and worthless, this is why people started doing proper benchmarks with emulation and 3dmark stresstest in order to get a much better idea. Here a perfect example of a stresstest:
As it's very obvious all gaming phones sustained their max performance in the 99 percentile without a problem, however the consumer grade phone dropped 30% of it's performance. Note that this wildlife stresstest is much less demanding than emulation or gaming with recording / hard to run game like genshin impact, so expect even more performance loss, this also causes a lot more issues in terms of frametimes.
Some Non gaming phones have reached touch response of gaming phones.
Another baseless claim, as mentioned, aside from the Iphone no android phone has a responsetime close to gaming phones. Reason obviously being battery life hits, so it wouldnt even make sense to implement a more responsive touch input anyways.
Not everyone suggests to buy a gaming phones over non gaming phones due to slower and lacking software support. If they can change that, it's there profit. Sales will go up, people for once start suggesting to buy gaming phone. They have a good set of hardware but not a good set of software.
Consumer grade phones are the ones you would usually recommend as they have features that typical consumers will like more on average, be it size, design, weight, camera or software support, nobody should reocmmend a gaming phone to anyone who doesnt do a lot of gaming. Also to debunk your entire crap with software real quick, the software on the Rog phones are excellent, sadly the software support is awful, big difference.
And also don't reply saying that Asus is good when it comes to update stability. Asus is not a god so stop praising them saying things like they always release bugs free update and companies like OnePlus puts out updates with bug. They all are the same in this category. Except for the speed of the update.
Nice troll, I'm constantly crapping on ASUS if they do something dumb, see Rog5 clown fiesta. You implying that I'm a fanboy is hysterical.
Also ASUS did handle the A11 upgrade on Rog3 WAY better than Oneplus did, hell their Oneplus 7T A11 update was/is on a disaster clown scale like the Rog5 currently is.
Thus far all you have shown is ignorance. Reading your post makes informed users head hurt.
Except there are literally 4 wifi antennas in the Rog3 for instance while consumer phones have half of it. Not only that but you can use dual band to connect to 2 wifi spots at the same time using them both simultaneously and to boot you get ASUS's hyperfusion technology, to quote gsmarena:
The ROG Phone 4 has a total of four Wi-Fi antennas and a system called HyperFusion, which allows the software to switch between these automatically, as well as a cellular data connection, for the lowest possible latency and best speed.
Wifi capabilities are measurably better on gaming phones that focus on wifi such as the Rog3. Wifi is much more stable than your typical consumer phones. Your claim about average wifi coverage is baseless and is something you can throw out the window. When doing a speedtest my Rog3 consistently outperformed a S20 ultra, Iphone 12, razer phone 1, and a motorolla one zoom, which the zoom hilariously enough came in 2nd, the worst of them all was the S20 ultra, this is based on 15 speedtests on all phones.
Gaming phones ranks higher in synthetic benchmark but that does not mean that real life experience is any different from any other devices having the same hardware and thermal throttling depends from device to device.
Another clueless claim that needs debunking this instant. Gaming phones do infact NOT score higher in synthethic benchmarks, it's exacly the opposite. Gaming Phones score the same as consumer grade phones as synthethic benchmarks are quite short and worthless, this is why people started doing proper benchmarks with emulation and 3dmark stresstest in order to get a much better idea. Here a perfect example of a stresstest:
As it's very obvious all gaming phones sustained their max performance in the 99 percentile without a problem, however the consumer grade phone dropped 30% of it's performance. Note that this wildlife stresstest is much less demanding than emulation or gaming with recording / hard to run game like genshin impact, so expect even more performance loss, this also causes a lot more issues in terms of frametimes.
Some Non gaming phones have reached touch response of gaming phones.
Another baseless claim, as mentioned, aside from the Iphone no android phone has a responsetime close to gaming phones. Reason obviously being battery life hits, so it wouldnt even make sense to implement a more responsive touch input anyways.
Not everyone suggests to buy a gaming phones over non gaming phones due to slower and lacking software support. If they can change that, it's there profit. Sales will go up, people for once start suggesting to buy gaming phone. They have a good set of hardware but not a good set of software.
Consumer grade phones are the ones you would usually recommend as they have features that typical consumers will like more on average, be it size, design, weight, camera or software support, nobody should reocmmend a gaming phone to anyone who doesnt do a lot of gaming. Also to debunk your entire crap with software real quick, the software on the Rog phones are excellent, sadly the software support is awful, big difference.
And also don't reply saying that Asus is good when it comes to update stability. Asus is not a god so stop praising them saying things like they always release bugs free update and companies like OnePlus puts out updates with bug. They all are the same in this category. Except for the speed of the update.
Nice troll, I'm constantly crapping on ASUS if they do something dumb, see Rog5 clown fiesta. You implying that I'm a fanboy is hysterical.
Also ASUS did handle the A11 upgrade on Rog3 WAY better than Oneplus did, hell their Oneplus 7T A11 update was/is on a disaster clown scale like the Rog5 currently is.
Thus far all you have shown is ignorance. Reading your post makes informed users head hurt.
