How should I interpret a closed Bug submission without any comment and without correction on the fol
Please tell us some basic information before asking for help:
- Model Name: Rog Phone 5 16/512
- Firmware Version: 200,210,226,229
- Rooted or not: Not
- Frequency of Occurrence: 100%
- APP Name & APP Version (If your issue relates to the app):
It's bugs are also here with others but have never been addressed.
The only Bug partially fixed is that of the PD / PPS chargers which finally work on the side port (but not on the bottom port)
What I tested did not make me want to go to the performance test, it made me too angry.
1- Asus considers this update to be high priority and important, so it is forced. So, if I don't unlock the bootloader or root, operations that block OTAs, the update will come back, so it's impossible to downgrade without losing the warranty.
2- An application launched with Armory Create prevents the superposition of another application, this since .151
- Main application in the foreground;
--parameter Armory Create ok
-- hidden application overlay, unusable.
- Layered secondary application configured with Armory Create and main application without Armory Create.
-- The overlay application is displayed above the main application and is usable
-- Armory Create setting is disabled
3 - Charge PD / PPS and all chargers with the 2 Quick Charge + PD protocols
-- Bug introduced with update .151, detected by other users at the beginning of January, confirmed by ASUS in February and promised correction.
-- 210 nothing, 226 nothing, 229 nothing
The turned off device also has this problem, which means it's the low level driver, which is even less reassuring
4- Automatic change of 3g-4G-4G+-5G connectivity depending on mobile signal strength
-- Loss of data when a strong 4G+ signal returns, Airplane mode Off-On or deactivate/reactivate the SIM card.
I think there is a minimum of correction to answer a user whatever the answer